How can China tech giants survive regulators? Cash - From abroad
The Biden administration is set to root out some of the past U.S.-China tech deals that are deemed security sensitive. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., or Cfius, has already forced two divestments last year. The Wall Street Journal reported that Cfius is expanding, hiring professionals from venture-capital firms, investment banks and technology backgrounds.
But the real trouble is at home. Beijing is cracking down on big tech too.
The Chinese government has drafted antitrust rules aimed at curbing monopolistic behaviors by its giant internet platforms. It suspended the initial public offering of Ant Group, which could have been the world’s largest-ever IPO. Then Jack Ma is rumored to have disappeared. He has resurfaced since.
Between December 24th and 28th, Alibaba’s valuation fell by 13%, or $91bn. This happened despite the $6bn in share buy-backs aiming to avert the slide. The decline in Alibaba’s share price also weighed on other internet and technology companies. Games publisher and dominant social network operator Tencent Holdings and e-commerce giant JD.com also felt the heat.
Chinese authorities have reputation for supporting national champions. Think about the alleged support that Huawei and TikTok have received. Then there is the forced technology transfer that Western companies have constantly complained about. Now, all of the sudden, Beijing has decided to rein in its own tech giants. Regulators are asking about Alibaba’s past success. Has that been due to a good business model, or to the company’s hold on some scarce resources and its monopoly position?
This complaint is not uniquely Chinese. US regulators want to unwind Facebook’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, which might well spell the disintegration of the Facebook empire. They are unhappy with the way Facebook is leveraging its user base and information. When it quickly copies Snapchat’s features in order to destroy a competitor, the game doesn’t look fair.
And at the heart of the turmoil in Silicon Valley and in Shenzhen is the controversy of “data advantage.” Both US and China are trying to avert more tech concentration. Ant, for instance, is looking for prospective buyers to divest some of its previous acquisitions. At least one sale might include its stake in Chinese bike-sharing startup Hellobike.
But here is another way of looking at the recent incidents. China and US are looking at very different things.
Chinese authorities have long supported national champions that’re seen as world-beating. Think Huawei, Lenovo, and Haier. They have all won big domestically and gone on to unseat global players. That’s also how Japan and South Korea got rich. You nurture an advanced industrial base, impose an export requirement on it, then support the winners who bring cash home.
This is where the disappointment lies. Alibaba’s international commerce is about 10% of its domestic revenue. Tencent’s WeChat has more than a billion monthly users in China, but “merely” 70 million user accounts registered overseas. JD.com operates mostly within China. The only exception is TikTok, which is owned by ByteDance. It’s the lone startup that has made inroads into America’s heartland. Is it a wonder that when TikTok faced political heat in India, the Chinese government approached ByteDance with offers of help?
Here is a revenue breakdown of the five leading companies in China.
JD.com and Alibaba are under extreme scrutiny. We haven’t heard of crackdowns against Huawei, Haier or Lenovo. Companies that have substantial overseas revenues are immune.
Here is another picture. It looks at user volume among the three major platforms.
Again, it is WeChat and Alibaba being scrutinized the most.
What’s emerging here is that the companies still receiving government supports are ones that have already gone international. These companies earn foreign money and bring home profits. The reason why China’s big tech companies are falling out of favor is simple: They are disrupting state-owned enterprises without winning abroad.
So what are the long-term implications? The tech war between China and US will only intensify during the Biden administration. If Alibaba, Tencent, JD.com and a host of other tech companies are to survive scrutiny from Beijing, they will need to gain traction for their own international expansion. They will not fight against Amazon in the US., but in South East Asia, the Middle East, and part of Europe. Those will be the frontier markets for for all tech giants.
Chinese big tech will survive. But to serve the national interest, it will have to expand internationally, very quickly.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Basel (Switzerland), March 2024. The acquisition of Syngenta by ChemChina in 2017 was a major event for the agricultural industry and, with a price tag of $43 billion, the largest ever foreign acquisition by a Chinese firm. A number of issues were...
This year China has been repeatedly accused of resorting to export-led growth (as if that were a crime), flooding world markets with goods, and exacerbating trade tensions. In this briefing I provide a measured, evidence-based review of recent Chi...
The trade policy stance of foreign governments to China’s goods exports is reviewed here. A balanced approach is taken—examining new import reforms facilitating sourcing from China as well as new import curbs. Further perspective is provided by co...
Contrary to reports, evidence from official sources reveals there is no broad-based Chinese surge in exports at the sectoral level. Four out of 98 Chapters (sectors) of the UN Harmonized System of Products each contributed more than 10% to the exp...
Purpose Using an institutional lens and drawing on the arguments of the external enabler perspective, this study aims to examine the role of digital technology adoption on the performance of microenterprises, with a focus on their level of formal...
As global attention has turned to Azerbaijan’s capital, Baku, for the U.N.’s ongoing COP29 climate summit, many business leaders are at a crossroads about how they can pitch in on the green transition. Adding to the uncertainty, Donald Trump’s ele...
At this critical juncture for world trade, particular care is needed in interpreting monthly Chinese export releases. Atypically low exports in 2023 inflate the 2024 year-on-year percentage increases in monthly Chinese exports. Better to compare t...
Recent tensions between the US and China have raised the spectre of technological decoupling. This column explores the impact of US Entity List restrictions on Chinese firms’ innovation. It shows that US sanctions reduce the quantity and quality o...
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Global Trade Alert, Zeitgeist Series Briefing no. 46, 21 November 2024
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 19 November 2024, ePub before print, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-08-2024-0390
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
IMD World Competitiveness Center Report, 14 November 2024, 8th edition
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in VoxEU 6 November 2024
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications