HomeResearch & Knowledgeback to Homeback to Research & KnowledgeKey account management at Sika (b3): Egon Spengler’s dilemmaback to

Case Study

Key account management at Sika (b3): Egon Spengler’s dilemma

By Martha L. Maznevski, Charles Dhanaraj and Christopher Zintel

3 pages

November 2017

Order this case study

Reference: IMD-7-1886

Sika AG is a global specialty chemicals company with a leading position in the development and production of systems and products for bonding, sealing, damping, reinforcing and protecting in the building sector and the motor vehicle industry. The CEO believed that one of the key reasons for the company’s success was its people and its organization. He had focused the company’s strategy on building a strong technology company with equally strong market presence in emerging markets. In 2014 the company’s almost 17,000 employees worked to supply over 23,000 products manufactured in 160 factories to customers in 90 countries and more than 20 industries. The CEO and his senior management team believed that the matrix organizational structure was appropriate for this complex organization because it gave strength to local managers while also leveraging opportunities across the target markets. As Sika’s business grew and customers and products became more specialized, the company had formally introduced a global key account management system, which incorporated Key Account Managers (KAMs) for customers who were buying significant volume of purchase from Sika. Depending on the geographic scope of the customers, Sika had local, regional and global KAMs. The introduction of KAMs had created a matrix structure at Sika, which posed challenges to the day-to-day management of the company’s operations. In particular, there were conflicting needs between account, functional and geographic managers. This case examines these conflicting needs in the context of a major client launching a regional tender for Africa purchases.

Learning Objective

The main target audience for this case is senior level executives seeking to understand the challenges and opportunities of leading in a matrix organizational structure.

Keywords

Matrix Organization, Leadership

Settings

Sika, Manufacturing, Chemicals
Present

Type

Field Research

Available Languages

English

IMD case studies are distributed through case clearing houses. In order to browse the collection and purchase copies please visit the links below.

The Case Centre

Cranfield University

Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]

Harvard Business School Publishing

60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]

Asia Pacific Case Center

NUCB Business School

1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]

IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

This case study is part of a series

Key account management at Sika (A): Leading in the matrix
Key account management at Sika (b1): Peter Venkman’s challenge
Key account management at Sika (b2): Ray Stantz’s position
Key account management at Sika (b3): Egon Spengler’s dilemma

This case study is part of a series

Key account management at Sika (A): Leading in the matrix
Key account management at Sika (b1): Peter Venkman’s challenge
Key account management at Sika (b2): Ray Stantz’s position
Key account management at Sika (b3): Egon Spengler’s dilemma

Keep reading

Article

Communicating the path to net zero using visual metaphor

Offshore infrastructure firm Heerema took an unconventional approach to communicating its net-zero ambition to win buy-in from employees and stakeholders.

Sustainability

By Heather Cairns-Lee, Ramon de Haas and Meike Kolthof

in I by IMD

Article

4 reasons why you should blow the whistle on yourself

If you violate a moral norm but no one has witnessed it, do you confess the wrongdoing or keep it hidden in the hope that no one will ever find out? There are

By Jennifer Jordan

in I by IMD

Case Study

Introduction to organizational system analysis

Organizational Design Business Transformation Organizational Culture

By Michael D. Watkins

Video

In times of transformation, social capital matters more than ever

IMD Professor of Strategy and Innovation Patrick Reinmoeller shares his strategies for leaders to preserve vital social capital connections during times of chan

Leadership

By Patrick Reinmoeller

in I by IMD

Article

How to make your ‘imposter’ monster a trusted friend

Most of us have an inner demon that says we are not good enough, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Here's how to deal with 'imposter syndrome'

Coaching Human Resources Workplace Well-Being

By Nathalie Ducrot and Séverine Jourdain

in I by IMD

Article

What kind of leader are you ?

Tradition and emergent types vary greatly; both have advantages and disadvantages. Take this short questionnaire to see where you are on the spectrum of old-sch

By Michael R. Wade

in I by IMD

Article

Can Europe’s unified bond compete with US treasuries?

The idea of an EU bond, a common safe asset, has been gaining attention lately, particularly following calls for its introduction this month by former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi.

Finance Global Business Competitiveness

By Arturo Bris

in The National

11 October 2024

Article

Strategy Stack: an integrated approach to decision-making

The ways popular frameworks are used fall short in today’s rapidly changing environment. Here is a new way to make better-informed strategic choices.

Change Management Competitiveness Decision Making Innovation Strategy

By Albrecht Enders, Ajay K. Kohli, Andreas König and Arnaud Chevallier

in I by IMD

Article

7 ways to build a corporate playground

Command and control kill. If you want your employees to express their creativity, build corporate playgrounds where they can experiment, take risks, and embrace

By George Kohlrieser

in I by IMD

Case Study

Bossard’s AI strategy for proven productivity (Cartoon case)

Artificial Intelligence Business Transformation Strategy

By Stefan Michel

Introduction to organizational system analysis

By Michael D. Watkins
Case reference: IMD-7-2607 ©2024

Summary

This note summarizes the STAR+ Organizational System Model as a powerful tool for leaders to diagnose, design, and transform organizations in rapidly changing environments. It outlines six key elements of an organizational system: Strategic Direction, Structure and Decision-Making, Processes and Systems, People and Capabilities, Measures and Rewards, and Culture. The note emphasizes the importance of understanding these elements and their interdependencies for effective organizational management and transformation. The STAR+ model, building on Jay Galbraith's seminal work on organizational systems, helps leaders navigate organizational complexity, diagnose issues, ensure coherence among elements, and guide transformation efforts. It stresses the critical role of culture and its interaction with other system components, particularly measures and rewards and leadership behaviors. A case study of Stefanie Eisenberg at Global's North American Operations illustrates the model's practical application. It demonstrates how systemic issues can undermine performance even in seemingly stable organizations and highlights the importance of sequencing change efforts.

Reference IMD-7-2607

Available Languages English

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Organizational Design

Business Transformation

Organizational Culture

Browse all topics

How to make your ‘imposter’ monster a trusted friend

By Nathalie Ducrot and Séverine Jourdain
in I by IMD

Summary

Most of us have an inner demon that says we are not good enough, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Here's how to deal with 'imposter syndrome'

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Coaching

Human Resources

Workplace Well-Being

Browse all topics

Can Europe’s unified bond compete with US treasuries?

By Arturo Bris
in The National 11 October 2024

Summary

The idea of an EU bond, a common safe asset, has been gaining attention lately, particularly following calls for its introduction this month by former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Finance

Global Business

Competitiveness

Browse all topics

Strategy Stack: an integrated approach to decision-making

By Albrecht Enders Ajay K. Kohli Andreas König and Arnaud Chevallier
in I by IMD

Summary

The ways popular frameworks are used fall short in today’s rapidly changing environment. Here is a new way to make better-informed strategic choices.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Change Management

Competitiveness

Decision Making

Innovation

Strategy

Browse all topics

Bossard’s AI strategy for proven productivity (Cartoon case)

By Stefan Michel
Case reference: IMD-7-2575 ©2024

Summary

Bossard, a Swiss company founded in 1731, has successfully transitioned from a product-centric approach to one that offers services and solutions. It has achieved significant revenue growth despite economic challenges. Its brand promise, “proven productivity,” guides its actions, including its early adoption of AI. From 2010 to 2022, the firm's net revenue grew from CHF 475 million to CHF 1.154 billion (7.7% CAGR), despite a massive currency appreciation, a global pandemic and a supply chain crisis. “Proven productivity” permeates all levels and activities of the company and serves as a guiding principle in everyday decisions: How do you increase the productivity of customers? According to public records, Bossard’s customers were original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), such as Tesla, John Deere and Thermoplan. Bossard did not serve the maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) market, nor did it sell through do-it-yourself (DIY) chains like Home Depot, Lowe’s, Adeo, Kingfisher, Bunnings, OBI and Bauhaus. Bossard already employs machine learning to anticipate demand trends across various products. The company's leadership is optimistic about leveraging generative AI for customer interactions. This could include an AI chatbot drawing on Bossard's extensive knowledge base to provide technical advice to customers, or AI-assisted tools to support Bossard’s own specialists in responding to enquiries. With a governance structure that promotes collaboration between the executive and non-executive boards, including AI expert Petra Ehmann, Bossard aims to democratize AI knowledge across the organization. It is also leveraging AI tools like Microsoft Copilot during its enterprise resource planning (ERP) system rollout. This strategic focus on AI aligns with Bossard’s dedication to enhancing customer productivity while embracing technological advancements to evolve its business. Balancing ongoing operations with strategic AI integration is a key challenge, but Bossard is confident in its ability to leverage AI to strengthen its brand and maintain its growth trajectory.

Reference IMD-7-2575

Organization Bossard Holding

Industry Manufacturing, Fasteners

Available Languages English

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Artificial Intelligence

Business Transformation

Strategy

Browse all topics