Instant gratification: UPS
In 2012 e-commerce in the US totaled $225.5 billion, a 713% increase from the $27.8 billion in 2000. Online purchases were projected to nearly double by 2017 and reach $434 billion. Ultimately, e-commerce depended on a few key factors, the most important of which was same-day delivery. In-store buying still accounted for $4.134 trillion, or 94.8% of total retail sales in the US in 2012. The primary reasons for this preference were the ability to touch and feel the products, to try before buying, and to gain the instant gratification of walking out with the purchase. However, in-store shopping had disadvantages: it cost time and money to go to the store, there was the risk that the required item would not be in stock, there was possibility of only a limited selection, and the risk that the store did not offer the best price. The benefits and risks of online shopping were nearly the mirror image. It was not possible to touch or try products in advance and if an item didn’t fit or work, there was the hassle of returning it. Even if everything went well, customers had to forfeit the instant gratification of getting their purchases straight away and wait a day or more for delivery. Given the size of the potential market, e-commerce retailers increasingly sought to provide consumers with hassle-free returns and same-day delivery. Success in doing so had the potential to propel sales beyond the projected $434 billion in 2017 to $500 billion, $750 billion or even more. Retailing had greatly evolved in the US from the early pioneering days of individual shops to department stores to mass discounters and category killers. E-commerce was the latest iteration but its further success involved more than just low pricing. For it to expand to more than 10% of total retail spending, return convenience and same-day delivery were likely required and the logistics required for this were non-trivial. How should Amazon, Walmart, Google, UPS and FedEx approach same-day delivery?
This note explores the evolution of retail in the US and asks students to consider the positions of Amazon, Walmart, Google, UPS and FedEx, to determine their strategy for approaching same-day delivery, including what changes to their business operating model, investments, structure, consumer value proposition, and infrastructure they will need to offer such a service. Supplementary information on each company is provided.
United Parcel Service, Logistics and Supply Chain, Logistics and Supply Chain, Courier
2012-2013
Cranfield University
Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]
Harvard Business School Publishing
60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]
NUCB Business School
1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]
IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
In this study, we analyze how the performance-aspiration gap influences strategic change in family firms, providing evidence of the moderating role...
The call by the former Italian prime minister and ECB president for massive investment in the EU is a wake-up call to Europe's economic stagnation....
The case highlights the significant role played by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in reducing its environmental footprint and promoting ...
There is a Chinese saying that wealth does not last beyond three generations, and the reality is that sustaining family businesses is a significant...
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in Review of Managerial Science October 2024, vol. 18, pp. 2981-3005 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00703-3
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD 9 September 2024
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications