HomeResearch & Knowledgeback to HomeStrategyback to Research & KnowledgeFiat and Peugeot’s Sevelnord venture (B1): Peugeot’s mandate for industrial investment negotiationsback to Strategy

Case Study

Fiat and Peugeot's Sevelnord venture (B1): Peugeot's mandate for industrial investment negotiations

By Francis Bidault and Mary Schweinsberg

16 pages

May 1996

Order this case study

Reference: IMD-3-0645

The second part of this series (cases B1 and B2) describe the perspectives of Peugeot and Fiat respectively as they prepare to enter in a major negotiation regarding SEVELNORD’s manufacturing capacity and production plan. The two cases follow the same outline and differ primarily on a few critical data that generate the difference of perspective between the two parties. Participants only read the “B” case of the company they will represent in the negotiation. The participants are also provided with a financial model (an Excel spreadsheet) to help them assess the profit implications of their decisions and compromises. The goal of this exercise is to make participants aware of the tradeoffs in alliances and the necessity to help the partner achieve a satisfactory performance in order to ensure the long term stability of the venture. Broader lessons can be drawn regarding negotiation techniques and tactics. Note: It is also possible to use only the A and C cases, skipping the negotiation exercise.

Keywords

European Strategy, Car

Settings

Europe
1991

Type

Field Research

Available Languages

English

Related material

Teaching note

IMD case studies are distributed through case clearing houses. In order to browse the collection and purchase copies please visit the links below.

The Case Centre

Cranfield University

Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]

Harvard Business School Publishing

60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]

Asia Pacific Case Center

NUCB Business School

1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]

IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

This case study is part of a series

Fiat and Peugeot's Sevelnord venture (A): Laying the foundations for a second success
Fiat and Peugeot's Sevelnord venture (B2): Fiat's guideline for the U60 negotiations
Fiat and Peugeot's Sevelnord venture (C): The situation
Fiat and Peugeot’s Sevelnord venture (B1): Peugeot’s mandate for industrial investment negotiations

This case study is part of a series

Fiat and Peugeot's Sevelnord venture (A): Laying the foundations for a second success
Fiat and Peugeot's Sevelnord venture (B2): Fiat's guideline for the U60 negotiations
Fiat and Peugeot's Sevelnord venture (C): The situation
Fiat and Peugeot’s Sevelnord venture (B1): Peugeot’s mandate for industrial investment negotiations

Keep reading

Article

Only connect: How to keep disparate workforce elements happy and motivated - IbyIMD

Today’s workforce often includes a mix of permanent employees, freelancers, and outside contractors – but even organizations with mostly external workforces or highly autonomous workforces need proximity to succeed over the long term. Here are fou...

Strategy Team

By Sebastian Reiche

in I by IMD

Case Study

Has Nike lost its stride?

Marketing Digital Strategy

By Ivy Buche and Goutam Challagalla

Video

The end of corporate passivity

Corporate leaders must stop being passive spectators and actively shape geopolitical outcomes to drive global competitiveness and collaboration.

Competitiveness Corporate Governance Decision Making Leadership Politics Strategy

By Arturo Bris

in I by IMD

Case Study

UrbanLuxe: Supply chain and M&A

Supply Chain Mergers and Acquisitions Operations Strategy

By Ralf W. Seifert and Richard Markoff

Article

Breaking up to move forward: Why CFOs are at the heart of the de-conglomeration trend - IbyIMD

In an age that prizes agility, breaking up is a strategy rather than a surrender, argues IMD’s Salvatore Cantale, as CFOs step forward as architects of value in the de-conglomeration era.

Agility Corporate Governance Finance Leadership Strategy Sustainability

By Salvatore Cantale

in I by IMD

Article

Transitioning from CFO to CEO: top tips from the inside track - IbyIMD

What does it take to move from CFO to CEO? Four top executives share candid lessons on leadership, risk, growth, and redefining the finance role.

Growth Leadership Organizational Transformation Strategy Team

By Jean-François Manzoni

in I by IMD

Article

Steady profit: Learning the lessons of future-ready companies

In an increasingly uncertain world, how do companies plan for the long term? Take this short quiz to test your knowledge of future readiness, and read on for insights from future-ready companies.

Strategy Future Readiness

By Howard H. Yu

in I by IMD Brain Circuits

21 May 2025

Case Study

Candles Killer: Lighting up the world at the bottom of the pyramid

Shenzhen Power-Solution (SPS), founded in 2009 in China as an entrepreneurial venture, disrupted traditional lighting markets in African villages with its flagship product, Candles Killer. This solar lamp, priced under $5, replaces hazardous keros...

Sustainability Customer Centricity Innovation Strategy

By Winter Nie and Yunfei Feng

Only connect: How to keep disparate workforce elements happy and motivated - IbyIMD

By Sebastian Reiche
in I by IMD

Summary

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Strategy

Team

Browse all topics

Has Nike lost its stride?

By Ivy Buche and Goutam Challagalla
Case reference: IMD-7-2598 ©2025

Summary

Set in 2024, the case describes the trajectory of Nike's success and how it had recently lost its way. The company was experiencing its worst slump in more than 10 years. Since 2020, CEO Donahoe oversaw a significant shift away from wholesale, with a focus on direct channels and a suite of apps. However, direct-to-consumer (DTC) sales failed to make up for the losses from previous wholesale partners. At the same time, competition from a new breed of smaller players increased. Critics claimed that the sportswear giant's product innovations had lagged, allowing nimble competitors to chisel away at its market share. Sales were flat or down in all geographies. In response, Donahoe announced a three-year, $2 billion cost cutting plan that involved laying off 2% of workers, which in turn created a sense of crisis at Nike. Investors also suffered as the stock performed worse than the broader market in the last three years. To make matters worse, a class action suit was filed against Donahoe and CFO Matthew Friend for misleading the market about the company's underperformance. How could Nike's top management team execute a strategic turnaround by building upon the company's core strengths of brand equity, product innovation and sports marketing? They had to reevaluate past strategies, rethink their assumptions and chart a comeback to restore the company to its former growth trajectory and market dominance.

Reference IMD-7-2598

Organization Nike

Industry Consumer Goods, Footwear

Available Languages English

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Marketing

Digital

Strategy

Browse all topics

The end of corporate passivity

By Arturo Bris
in I by IMD

Summary

Corporate leaders must stop being passive spectators and actively shape geopolitical outcomes to drive global competitiveness and collaboration.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Competitiveness

Corporate Governance

Decision Making

Leadership

Politics

Strategy

Browse all topics

UrbanLuxe: Supply chain and M&A

By Ralf W. Seifert and Richard Markoff
Case reference: IMD-2654 ©2024

Summary

This brief case exercise presents an increasingly common business scenario: An established player acquires a small, agile start-up to re-energize its value proposition. In this case, established global beauty giant UrbanLuxe acquires beauty start-up KYX. UrbanLuxe represents an old-school company selling a classic portfolio mainly via traditional distribution channels of luxury and travel retail, whereas KYX is exclusively an e-commerce brand. UrbanLuxe has a stable – perhaps stale – product line while KYX is in constant experimental churn, with an influencer-based media strategy that brings inherent demand volatility. The supply chain director is tasked with identifying the supply chain risks and opportunities associated with the acquisition. The two companies are different from both an operations perspective and a marketing perspective. UrbanLuxe has five factories servicing a global demand. KYX relies on one co-manufacturer focused on the US market. UrbanLuxe distributes to classic retailers from its own warehouses, KYX uses a third-party logistics provider for its exclusively e-commerce business. Further complicating matters, UrbanLuxe’s CEO has ambitious growth plans to make KYX a global brand. The supply chain director must not only consider integrating the acquisition but also supporting the growth strategy, for which they are asked to find cost savings to provide funding. The case provides a vehicle for students to consider the supply chain challenges a company might face in successfully integrating a starkly different acquisition. This case anchored in the real world will elicit universal challenges in companies today.

Reference IMD-2654

Available Languages English

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Supply Chain

Mergers and Acquisitions

Operations

Strategy

Browse all topics

Breaking up to move forward: Why CFOs are at the heart of the de-conglomeration trend - IbyIMD

By Salvatore Cantale
in I by IMD

Summary

In an age that prizes agility, breaking up is a strategy rather than a surrender, argues IMD’s Salvatore Cantale, as CFOs step forward as architects of value in the de-conglomeration era.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Agility

Corporate Governance

Finance

Leadership

Strategy

Sustainability

Browse all topics

Transitioning from CFO to CEO: top tips from the inside track - IbyIMD

By Jean-François Manzoni
in I by IMD