The traditionalist leader sees their purpose as maximizing profit and creating short-term economic value for shareholders.
Reserved or defensive – corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives are determined on a strict economic cost-benefit basis, ensuring basic compliance with laws and industry norms.
Leadership that is unable or unwilling to respond to stakeholder expectations can lead to stakeholder conflicts or corporate crises, resulting in job losses, destruction of shareholder value, and threats to business survival.
The opportunity seeker shares some of the characteristics of the traditionalist but aims to create social value because of its business and reputational benefits.
Opportunistic – views CSR and sustainability as strategic opportunities to maximize shareholder value and improve financial performance.
If leadership decides to scale back on social and/or environmental initiatives, stakeholders may interpret it as evidence of window-dressing or greenwashing, eroding trust and putting the company’s social license at risk.
The integrator’s greater sense of accountability to stakeholders means they try to deliver on multiple bottom lines (profit, people, planet) and go beyond economic, legal, and strategic concerns to incorporate a broader purpose-driven perspective.
Proactive – aims to drive positive change and integrative value creation in business and society.
With growing expectations not just to do better but to do more, integrators may also attempt to do too much, exposing themselves to the priority trap and risking loss of focus.
Driven by strong moral intentions, idealist leaders dedicate their businesses and energy to solving societal challenges.
Sees the business as a means (not an end) to tackle social problems – even if it impedes growth or risks business longevity.
If they do not invest in management development, the idealist can be caught in an underperformance trap, risking business failure. The breadth and depth of their challenges also leave them more at risk of burnout.
Different leadership styles all have their advantages and disadvantages. Being aware of the pros and cons of each optimizes your decision-making when faced with complex problems, helping you navigate a business successfully and sustainably in times of polycrisis.
In the first of a series of five brain circuits on effective communication for leaders, Robert Vilkelis provides techniques to help manage your nerves and deliver a high-impact presentation by focusing on...
Leaders who do not recognize their own blockers deny themselves the opportunity to think autonomously and self-critically. Consult the following checklist to gauge whether you are internally “blocked” and read on for...
July 22, 2025 • by Katharina Lange in Brain Circuits
Rather than choosing between crisis mode and future planning, leaders should learn to focus simultaneously on both short and long-term goals....
Practicing a speech is intimidating. Not only do you have to know your stuff, but you also have to think about your structure, your gestures, and your audience. Here’s how to use...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience