On 2 April 2025, the United States firebombed the global trade rulebook. With a barrage of sweeping tariffs, the world’s largest economy, once the system’s architect, turned enforcer, judge, and executioner.
This wasn’t just another round of tariff tit-for-tat. It was something deeper and more disruptive: a structural strike against the global trade system itself, driven less by economic strategy than by political grievance. For global business leaders, especially those in manufacturing, supply chains, and corporate strategy, the implications are already unfolding.
“This is not economic policymaking; it’s emotional theatre.”
To understand this moment, don’t reach for an economics textbook. Reach for a political speech.
President Trump’s words in his 2 April address were unambiguous: “For decades, our country has been looted, pillaged, raped, and plundered by nations near and far, both friend and foe alike. American steelworkers, auto workers, farmers, and skilled craftsmen…watched in anguish as foreign leaders have stolen our jobs, foreign cheaters have ransacked our factories, and foreign scavengers have torn apart our once beautiful American dream.”
This is not economic policymaking; it’s emotional theatre. A grievance doctrine now drives US trade: the belief that America has been betrayed by a system rigged by globalist elites and exploited by foreign rivals.
In this worldview, tariffs aren’t just policy tools. They’re weapons. Trade is no longer about mutual benefit but about payback. Allies are recast as freeloaders. Rules are seen not as stabilizers but as shackles.
The result is a trade strategy that is politically powerful, and economically incoherent. Tariffs aren’t chosen because they solve problems. They’re chosen because they dramatize them.
Tariffs are popular not despite their ineffectiveness, but because of it.
Strip away the politics, and the economics are brutally simple: tariffs can’t fix what’s broken.
They won’t reduce the US trade deficit: it’s driven by domestic imbalances in savings and spending. They won’t revive manufacturing because that takes capital, infrastructure, and skilled workers, not just border taxes. And they certainly won’t help the middle class, 90% of whom work in services, which tariffs don’t touch.
Tariffs are popular not despite their ineffectiveness, but because of it. They allow politicians to appear tough, deflect blame, and dodge real solutions. As a result, protectionism is now the American default, not a Trump-era detour, but a structural feature of US politics.
This is not a general economic tremor. It’s a targeted hit on global supply chains. The fallout has already begun.
If you operate in global manufacturing, logistics, or procurement, the April 2 tariffs weren’t just political noise. They were a shot across your bow.
This is not a general economic tremor. It’s a targeted hit on global supply chains. The fallout has already begun.
This isn’t a temporary disruption. It’s a redesign moment. And those who adapt first will gain the edge.
History reminds us that tariff shocks don’t stop at the border. In the 1930s, US tariffs ignited a global spiral of retaliation. Could 2025 be a replay?
One risk is cascading protectionism: US tariffs push exports to third countries, flooding local markets and stoking defensive tariffs in response. If nations react emotionally, as the US just did, things could spiral.
But there’s also a counterforce: domino liberalization. Exporters shut out of the US will push their governments to open new markets. Trade deals emerge. Tariffs fall elsewhere.
Which force prevails, protection or liberalization, will shape the global business environment in the years to come.
In the most hopeful scenario, the rest of the world pushes forward
The global trade system hasn’t collapsed, but it’s wobbling. Three paths lie ahead, each with distinct business implications:
Tensions persist, but the system muddles through. The US continues to violate WTO norms, while others respond with discipline. Regional and bilateral deals proliferate.
Business impact: More red tape, but also more opportunity, especially outside the US. Firms that stay flexible and agile in diverse regulatory environments will benefit.
This is where geopolitics trumps economics. The world splits into three blocs: a US-led camp (with reluctant followers like Canada and Mexico), a China-led bloc, and an EU-led one. Trade barriers go up between them.
Business impact: Strategic alignment becomes existential. Firms may have to duplicate operations, firewall IP, and localize value chains to continue operating across blocs.
In the most hopeful scenario, the rest of the world pushes forward. “Leadership herds” of like-minded nations form new coalitions, advance digital and green trade rules, and revitalize WTO frameworks, without US participation.
Business impact: Investment, innovation, and partnerships shift to economies still committed to openness. US exposure becomes a risk to hedge, not a market to scale.
The future is uncertain but standing still isn’t an option. Here’s what business and policy leaders should prioritize.
Trump’s Great Trade Hack exposed a truth many sensed but few said out loud: the US is no longer the anchor of the global trade system. That anchor has been cut. But the system hasn’t sunk, yet.
More than 85% of global trade still flows outside the US. That means governments, firms, and institutions across the world have both the power and the responsibility to keep the system afloat, not just by defending it, but by reinventing it.
If they don’t, the collapse won’t come with a bang. It will arrive as a slow bleed, through lost investment, shrinking markets, rising costs, and missed innovation.
Trade isn’t just about goods. It’s about predictability. Trust. Prosperity. And right now, it’s on the line. The decision whether to rise to the moment or retreat from it will shape the global economy for generations.
This article is based on Richard Baldwin’s new CEPR eBook, The Great Trade Hack: Why Trump’s Trade War Fails and the World Moves On. Download the book for free [ADD URL hyperlink] to explore the full analysis and scenarios shaping the future of global trade.
Donald Trump’s blueprint for American greatness isn’t the 1950s – it’s the 1890s – a time of high tariffs, hard power, and imperial ambition. To understand his vision of MAGA 2025, look...
To win amidst geopolitical uncertainty, organizations need robust ways to analyze and mitigate risks, says Omar Toulan ...
Board members have a central role to play in helping organizations steer a safe path in a polarized and skeptical world....
Audio available
When trade barriers rise and key markets collapse, companies face tough strategic decisions. Lessons from Finnish industry offer a practical playbook for navigating exit under uncertainty....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience