The Hinrich-IMD Sustainable Trade Index 2022

The Hinrich-IMD Sustainable Trade Index 2022

Sustainable Trade Index

The IMD World Competitiveness Center and the Hinrich Foundation combined their expertise in 2022 to build the Hinrich-IMD Sustainable Trade Index to stimulate discussion among policymakers, business executives, and civil society leaders striving to advance sustainable and mutually beneficial global trade.

The Hinrich Foundation is a unique Asia-based philanthropic organization that works to advance mutually beneficial and sustainable global trade. It believes sustainable global trade strengthens relationships between nations and improves people’s lives and supports original research and education programs that build understanding and leadership in global trade. It prides itself on taking an approach that is independent, fact-based, and objective, and on being an authoritative source of knowledge, sharp analysis, and fresh thinking for policymakers, businesses, media, and scholars engaged in global trade.

The Hinrich-IMD Sustainable Trade Index measures a country’s readiness and capacity to participate in the international trading system in a manner that supports the long-term goals of economic growth, environmental protection, and societal development.  

While global trade has helped lift hundreds of millions of people around the world out of poverty, the benefits do not come without risks. If an economy is unprepared for the consequences of trade growth, it may result in labor disruption, environmental degradation, and worsening inequality. However, proactive and responsible government policy and farsighted corporate decision making can harness the positive elements of trade while mitigating the negative, making for a more robust global trading community.

Methodology

The Hinrich-IMD Sustainable Trade Index measures 30 economies’ readiness and capacity to participate in the global trading system in a manner that supports the long-term goals of economic growth, environmental protection, and societal development.

It does so via 70 indicators (pieces of data) from a wide variety of sources (each cited), which are then grouped into three pillars:

The Economic pillar

This measures an economy’s ability to ensure and promote economic growth through international trade. In this category, economies receive scores for indicators that demonstrate a link between the trading system and economic growth.

Some indicators capture the quality of trade infrastructure, while others measure the ease of conducting international trade, such as current account convertibility, exchange rate stability, and trade costs associated with cross-border transactions.

We measure export diversification by evaluating an economy’s bilateral trade destinations and how heavily its exports are concentrated by sector – because economies with diversified export markets and products are better equipped to absorb external economic shocks.

Furthermore, we consider the technological infrastructure and innovation capabilities of an economy by assessing its emphasis on research and development investments and digital technologies, which are key drivers for the production of sophisticated and sustainable goods and services.

The Societal pillar

Social factors matter in an economy’s capacity to trade internationally over the long term. Economies are measured on the environment that encourages and supports the development of human capital, such as the extent of education and labor standards.

This pillar also captures factors that influence public support for trade expansion. These include income inequality, political stability, goods produced by forced and child labor, and governmental response to human trafficking.

The Environmental pillar

This measures the extent to which an economy’s trade supports sustainable resources. The factors include measurements of non-renewable natural resources in trade and the management of externalities that arise from economic growth and participation in the global trading system.

While an economy’s capacity to participate in the global trading system is dependent on economic development, achieving sustainable trade requires prudent stewardship of natural resources and limiting externalities in an economy’s economic calculus to promote its overall environmental capital.

The indicators in this section measure an economy’s environmental capital and include indicators for air and water pollution. In terms of future impact, we measure national environmental standards, carbon emissions, and share of natural resources in exports.

We have added new indicators and updated other components to further refine the index from prior iterations.

For more on data preparation and data processing, please download the full report in the link below.

Results

Overall STI
Rank
Economy
Value
Score
1
New Zealand
0,00
100,00
2
United Kingdom
0,00
94,38
3
Hong Kong, SAR
0,00
87,87
4
Japan
0,00
83,09
5
Singapore
0,00
82,70
6
Australia
0,00
78,23
7
Canada
0,00
76,48
8
South Korea
0,00
75,35
9
United States
0,00
71,57
10
Taiwan
0,00
65,53
11
Chile
0,00
62,87
12
Philippines
0,00
49,52
13
China
0,00
49,42
14
Malaysia
0,00
47,97
15
Thailand
0,00
46,55
16
Mexico
0,00
45,22
17
Cambodia
0,00
45,04
18
Indonesia
0,00
41,21
19
Ecuador
0,00
40,98
20
Vietnam
0,00
40,54
21
Peru
0,00
36,71
22
Sri Lanka
0,00
36,55
23
Laos
0,00
31,32
24
Bangladesh
0,00
27,41
25
Brunei
0,00
21,81
26
India
0,00
11,67
27
Papua New Guinea
0,00
11,33
28
Myanmar
0,00
3,20
29
Pakistan
0,00
2,36
30
Russia
0,00
0,00
Rank
Economy
Value
Score
Population
Wealth
Membership
1
New Zealand
0,00
100,00
Small
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
2
United Kingdom
0,00
94,38
Large
High
CPTPP (applicant)
3
Hong Kong, SAR
0,00
87,87
Small
High
APEC
4
Japan
0,00
83,09
Large
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
5
Singapore
0,00
82,70
Small
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
6
Australia
0,00
78,23
Medium
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
7
Canada
0,00
76,48
Medium
High
APEC, CPTPP
8
South Korea
0,00
75,35
Large
High
APEC, RCEP
9
United States
0,00
71,57
Large
High
APEC
10
Taiwan
0,00
65,53
Medium
High
APEC
11
Chile
0,00
62,87
Medium
Medium
APEC, CPTPP
12
Philippines
0,00
49,52
Large
Medium
APEC, RCEP
13
China
0,00
49,42
Large
Medium
APEC, RCEP
14
Malaysia
0,00
47,97
Medium
Medium
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
15
Thailand
0,00
46,55
Large
Medium
APEC, RCEP
16
Mexico
0,00
45,22
Large
Medium
APEC, CPTPP
17
Cambodia
0,00
45,04
Medium
Low
RCEP
18
Indonesia
0,00
41,21
Large
Medium
APEC, RCEP
19
Ecuador
0,00
40,98
Medium
Medium
CPTPP (applicant)
20
Vietnam
0,00
40,54
Large
Medium
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
21
Peru
0,00
36,71
Medium
Medium
APEC, CPTPP
22
Sri Lanka
0,00
36,55
Medium
Medium
23
Laos
0,00
31,32
Small
Low
RCEP
24
Bangladesh
0,00
27,41
Large
Low
25
Brunei
0,00
21,81
Small
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
26
India
0,00
11,67
Large
Low
27
Papua New Guinea
0,00
11,33
Small
Low
APEC
28
Myanmar
0,00
3,20
Large
Low
RCEP
29
Pakistan
0,00
2,36
Large
Low
30
Russia
0,00
0,00
Large
Medium
APEC
Notes
The Hinrich-IMD Sustainable Trade Index measures a country’s readiness and capacity to participate in the international trading system in a manner that supports long-term goals of economic growth, environmental protection, and societal development.  
Source
Score distribution
Filtered economies
30-economy average
1.01. Consumer price inflation
Rank
Economy
Value
Score
1
Japan
-0,26
100,00
2
Ecuador
0,13
95,75
3
China
0,85
87,89
4
Thailand
1,23
83,76
5
Brunei
1,50
80,82
6
Indonesia
1,56
80,17
7
Hong Kong, SAR
1,57
80,07
8
Taiwan
1,82
77,31
9
Vietnam
1,87
76,77
10
Singapore
2,31
72,03
11
Malaysia
2,48
70,15
12
South Korea
2,50
69,92
13
United Kingdom
2,59
68,94
14
Australia
2,82
66,42
15
Cambodia
2,96
64,92
16
Canada
3,40
60,13
17
Myanmar
3,64
57,43
18
Laos
3,75
56,21
19
Philippines
3,93
54,32
20
New Zealand
3,94
54,17
21
Peru
3,98
53,76
22
Papua New Guinea
4,49
48,23
23
Chile
4,52
47,80
24
United States
4,69
46,04
25
India
5,52
36,96
26
Bangladesh
5,56
36,51
27
Mexico
5,69
35,03
28
Sri Lanka
5,96
32,13
29
Russia
6,69
24,10
30
Pakistan
8,90
0,00
Rank
Economy
Value
Score
Population
Wealth
Membership
1
Japan
-0,26
100,00
Large
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
2
Ecuador
0,13
95,75
Medium
Medium
CPTPP (applicant)
3
China
0,85
87,89
Large
Medium
APEC, RCEP
4
Thailand
1,23
83,76
Large
Medium
APEC, RCEP
5
Brunei
1,50
80,82
Small
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
6
Indonesia
1,56
80,17
Large
Medium
APEC, RCEP
7
Hong Kong, SAR
1,57
80,07
Small
High
APEC
8
Taiwan
1,82
77,31
Medium
High
APEC
9
Vietnam
1,87
76,77
Large
Medium
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
10
Singapore
2,31
72,03
Small
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
11
Malaysia
2,48
70,15
Medium
Medium
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
12
South Korea
2,50
69,92
Large
High
APEC, RCEP
13
United Kingdom
2,59
68,94
Large
High
CPTPP (applicant)
14
Australia
2,82
66,42
Medium
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
15
Cambodia
2,96
64,92
Medium
Low
RCEP
16
Canada
3,40
60,13
Medium
High
APEC, CPTPP
17
Myanmar
3,64
57,43
Large
Low
RCEP
18
Laos
3,75
56,21
Small
Low
RCEP
19
Philippines
3,93
54,32
Large
Medium
APEC, RCEP
20
New Zealand
3,94
54,17
Small
High
APEC, CPTPP, RCEP
21
Peru
3,98
53,76
Medium
Medium
APEC, CPTPP
22
Papua New Guinea
4,49
48,23
Small
Low
APEC
23
Chile
4,52
47,80
Medium
Medium
APEC, CPTPP
24
United States
4,69
46,04
Large
High
APEC
25
India
5,52
36,96
Large
Low
26
Bangladesh
5,56
36,51
Large
Low
27
Mexico
5,69
35,03
Large
Medium
APEC, CPTPP
28
Sri Lanka
5,96
32,13
Medium
Medium
29
Russia
6,69
24,10
Large
Medium
APEC
30
Pakistan
8,90
0,00
Large
Low
Notes
Harmonised inflation rates, year average.
Source
IMF
Score distribution
Filtered economies
30-economy average
Meet the team
Professor Arturo Bris
Professor of Finance, Director of IMD World Competitiveness Center

An author and in-demand speaker, Arturo Bris (www.arturobris.org) ranks among the top 100 most read finance academics in the world. His research and consulting activities focus on the international aspects of financial regulation, and in particular on the effects of bankruptcy, short sales, insider trading, and merger laws.

 

Christos Cabolis
Chief Economist of the WCC and Adjunct Professor of Economics and Competitiveness

Christos Cabolis is Chief Economist and Head of Operations at the IMD World Competitiveness Center. He is also Adjunct Professor of Economics and Competitiveness at IMD. His teaching focuses on courses related to Business Economics, Macroeconomics, Corporate Finance, Financial Management and Industrial Organization.

Chuin Wei Yap
Program Director, International Trade Research at Hinrich Foundation

As the program director for international trade research, Mr. Yap leads the Foundation’s development of original research content.

Offering analysis and insights across the diverse domains of global trade, Mr. Yap…

Stephen Olson
Senior Research Fellow at Hinrich Foundation

Mr. Olson began his career in Washington DC as an international trade negotiator and served on the US negotiating team for the NAFTA negotiations.

He subsequently became president of the Hong Kong-based Pacific Basin…

Full report

The full report contains an expanded version of the above information.

Insights